The Present/The Babylon Line

bcc9yhbrtplum61bkhvy
Is there a place in the theater for a play that is not a blockbuster, is cast with stars, has critics raving and tickets unavailable? Actually, yes. This past week, after we saw a blockbuster on Broadway (in previews) — “The Present” — the next evening we attended what might be categorized by a “well” play — well-acted, well-written and well-received by the audience, but with little critical acclaim — “The Babylon Line” at Lincoln Center Theater.

present_fb1200x630

“The Present” originated in Australia featuring uberstar Cate Blanchett and her frequent co-star, the superb Richard Roxburgh. It was adapted from Chekhov’s first play and transported in time to post-Glasnost Russia. For three hours, we watched wonderful acting by the stars and the entire ensemble. What was missing was any emotional transfer from the stage to the audience, or at least to me. Lots of dysfunctional people, lots of sex, and LOTS of vodka drinking. And even several attention-getting pistol shots at the end (remember, it’s Chekhov) with real blanks (an oxymoron?). But who cared? Dissolute characters devoid of any reality. It’ll probably win a bunch of Tonys. gold star

“The Babylon Line” is set somewhere different — Levittown, Long Island, 1967. A creative writing class for adults. Playwright Richard Greenberg (Tony winner, “Take Me Out”) has a pitch-perfect ear for this generation, as well as for the creative-writing-class piñata. The six parts are perfectly cast, the dialog rings true, and it’s a delight to watch. Forget the weak reviews. It stimulated and delighted us. And not even a drop of vodka. gold star

Ben Rosen

One Response to “The Present/The Babylon Line”

  1. I agreed with Ben overall on “The Babylon Line.” I really liked Greenberg’s writing here more than in some of his recent previous plays, and felt the main characters’ voices were developed distinctly. The play posed some fundamental relevant-to-all questions. And, I liked the way he wrapped up all the loose ends, so I found the play was satisfying. Not cutting edge or avant-garde or edge-of-your-seat, but satisfying and (as Ben said) “well”.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.